Riding Out the Credit Collapse

Arthur Magazine, Spring 2008

There’s two kinds of people asking me about the economy lately: people with money wanting to know how to keep it “safe,” and people without money, wanting to know how to keep safe, themselves.

Maybe it’s the difference between those two concerns that best explains the underlying nature of today’s fiscal crisis.

Is what’s going on in the economy right now really worse than anything that’s happened in the past few decades? Are we heading towards a bank collapse like what happened in 1929? Or something even worse?

On a certain level, none of these questions really matter. Not as they’re being phrased, anyway. What we think of as “the economy” today isn’t real, it’s virtual. It’s a speculative marketplace that has very little to do with getting real things to the people who need them, and much more to do with providing ways for passive investors to grow their capital.

This economy of markets was created to give the rising merchant class in the late middle ages a way to invest their winnings. Instead of actually working, or even injecting capital into new enterprises, they learned to “make markets” in things that were scarce. Or, rather, in things that could be made scarce, like land.

That’s how speculation was born. Speculation in land, gold, coal, food…pretty much anything. Because the wealthy had such so much excess capital to invest, they made markets in stuff that the rest of us actually used. The problem is that when coal or corn isn’t just fuel or food but also an asset class, the laws of supply and demand cease to be the principle forces determining their price. When there’s a lot of money and few places to invest it, anything considered a speculative asset becomes overpriced. And then real people can’t afford the stuff they need.

The speculative economy is related to the real economy, but more as a parasite than a positive force. It is detached from the real needs of people, and even detached from the real commerce that goes on between humans. It is a form of meta-commerce, like a Las Vegas casino betting on the outcome of a political election. Only the bets, in this case, change the real costs of the things being bet on.

That’s what happened in the housing market and the credit market—which, these days, are actually the same thing. Here’s the story, in the simplest terms:

Bush’s tax cuts and other measures favoring the rich led to the biggest redistribution of wealth from poor to rich in American history. The result was that the wealthy—the investment class—had more money to invest, or lend, than there were people and businesses looking to borrow.

The easiest way to bring more borrowers into the system—and to create more of a market for money—was to promote homeownership in America. This is precisely what the Bush administration did, touting home ownership as an American right. Of course, they weren’t talking about home ownership at all, but rather pushing people to borrow money tied to the value of a house. If people could be persuaded to take mortgages on homes, real estate values would go up for those already invested (like land trusts and real estate funds) and banks would have a market for the excess money they had accumulated.

In short, there was a surplus of credit in the system. Americans were encouraged to borrow in the form of mortgages, which created demand for the credit banks wanted to sell. In many cases the credit itself wasn’t even real, but leveraged off some other inflated commodity that the bank or investor may have owned.

Banks and mortgage companies invented some really shady and difficult-to-understand mortgage contracts, designed to get people to borrow more money than they could . Banks didn’t care so much about lending money to people who wouldn’t be able to pay it back, because that’s not how they were going to earn their money, anyway. They provided the money for mortgage companies to lend, and in return won the rights to underwrite the loans when they were packaged and sold to other people and institutions.

So a bank might provide the cash for a bunch of loans, but then get it back, plus a huge commission, when those loans were packaged and sold to someone else.

Lots of people take out mortgages, and housing prices rise. This is used as evidence to convince more people that real estate is a great investment, and more people buy into the housing bubble. Lots of these people put little or no money down, and buy mortgages whose interests rates are going to change for the worse. But they believe the price of their home is inevitably going to go up, and pin their futures on the idea that they can refinance their mortgage before their rate changes. Since the house will be worth more, the mortgage for what they owe should be easier to get; it will represent a smaller percentage of the new total cost of the house.

Of course, this was dumb. Banks didn’t really care (because they weren’t holding the bad paper) but the people investing in those “mortgage-backed securities” were slowly getting wise to the fact that many of the borrowers were in over their heads. What to do? The credit industry went ahead and lobbied Washington to change the bankruptcy laws. While corporations could claim bankruptcy and stop paying for their retirees’ health coverage, individuals would no longer be able to claim bankruptcy, and even if they did, they would still owe their creditors the money they borrowed, forever. The credit industry spent over $100 million lobbying lawmakers for the new provisions.

Then, just like the credit industry predicted, loans start going bad. (The industry labels these loans “sub prime” because they want to make it look like the borrowers were somehow less-than-respectable people. But the term really just refers to a less-than-respectable loan.) As homeowners default on their mortgages, housing prices start to go down. This, in turn, makes it impossible for people to refinance their mortgages when they thought they would; in fact, now many homeowners actually owe more on their home than the home is worth. How can you refinance a million-dollar loan on a house that is only worth half that? You can’t, so instead you have to hold onto the variable-rate loan that you foolishly bought from the predatory lender. The rate rises higher and faster than you can pay it.

Lenders go ahead and start foreclosing on properties, kicking out the mortgage holders who can’t pay. But this creates another problem: what to do with the house? It’s not even worth the outstanding portion of the loan, in many cases. And even if they can sell it, how to distribute the money? No one even really knows whose mortgages belong to whom, as they’ve been sold as parts of packages, again and again, to different lenders, pension funds, money markets…you name it.

This leads to what became known as the “credit crunch” or “liquidity crisis.” No one feels good about lending money anymore because so much of it was tied in one way or another to these bad mortgages. The creditors don’t want to take possession of all these foreclosed homes, and they turn to the government for help.

Under the guise of helping homeowners “stay in their homes,” the government starts bandying about various “relief packages.” The Treasury department and the Fed are actually taking a two-pronged strategy towards fixing the problem. One prong is cynical PR, and the other is just plain stupid.

First, they want to create the illusion that something is being done, so they talk about “superfunds” to bail out homeowners, freezes on rate hikes, checks mailed to every taxpayer, and other useless gestures. They do all this to appease angry consumers and consumer advocates because they won’t want real lending industry regulation (like what Barney Frank and other progressives are pushing for) to gain any traction.

Second, they want to make more money available to the creditors (banks), so they can keep lending money—because this is their business. So the Fed lowers interest rates again and again. Banks get more money, and guess what? We’re back where we started: with tons of money and nowhere to invest it! By lowering the “prime lending rate,” they simply add to the surplus cash that created the problem in the first place.

Of course, both measures serve to stave off panic selling, because it seems as though something real is being done. Homeowners may get a slight delay in the paralyzing rate increases on their mortgages, giving banks and creditors the chance to make a more orderly exit. They will bail from these mortgages while selling the artificially secured credit to the likes of you and me through money market accounts and other retail products. They just need time to make sure the real losses trickle down to someone else.

And remember: this whole mortgage fiasco is just a little preview of what happens next year when the credit card industry faces the very same self-imposed “crunch.” In the case of mortgage lenders, at least the terms of the loans were disclosed. Credit card companies—which are some of the very same banks that are in the mortgage mess today—are busy rewriting their policies, increasing rates, and adding fees to the policies of people already in debt to them.

You know those little ‘inserts’ in your credit card bill? Read them, and you’ll find out, like I did, that some credit card companies have begun charging interest on your purchases from the moment you make the purchase. You pay finance charges even if you pay your whole bill every month. Most people carry big balances, so they won’t notice the additional charges, or at least that’s what the credit card companies are—quite literally—banking on.

* * *

After a certain point, consumers just won’t be able to pay their bills. Even though they’ve paid the cost of their purchases several times over, they’re simply buried in interest and interest on the interest, sometimes compounding at a rate of 30 or 40 percent per year. The creditors know this, which is why they’ve sold a lot of this debt to other banks, pension plans, money market funds…you get the picture: the kinds of places where we invest our retirement money. The banks invested in us; we were the assets. Now that we’re about to go broke, they’re busy selling us to other financial institutions in a game of musical chairs that will cost the last debtholder a lot of money. Of course, unless we can convince some foreign sheiks to buy some lousy US assets with their oil money, that last debt holder will end up being you and me.

Over the past few months I’ve spoken to top strategists at some of the biggest banks in the world, and they share my perception of the scenario. Most of them are “holding cash” as their main investment strategy, spread out over a few of the major currencies. Those making money are doing so by short-selling shares of other companies in the same finance industry that they supposedly work for.

The bigger picture, of course, is that speculation just worked too well for too long. The disparity between the market values and real values (rich people and poor people) got too large. Every asset class, even money itself, got too expensive. We became more valuable for our borrowing power than our labor—which also meant there was no way to work off our debt. Meanwhile, the people using reality as an investment vehicle have overwhelmed the real economy on which their “structured investments” are based.

Sure, this has happened before. It’s just that, traditionally, when wealth disparity got too great and there wasn’t enough money in the right places, the wealthiest bankers temporarily suspended their greed to bail out the system. Or progressive tax policies opened corporate coffers, permitting a “New Deal” that employed people while rebuilding the infrastructure required to make real things and provide real services to citizens.

Today, however, such temporary restraints on greed are systematically untenable and philosophically unthinkable. Conservatives are still so angry about New Deal reforms of the 1930s that that they have infused politics and banking with an economic ideology that sees any regulation of worker exploitation or predatory investment as anti-capitalist, anti-American, and even anti-God.

So instead we are the beneficiaries of “wink” reform: stuff that’s supposed to make us feel good while reassuring the speculators that their interests will remain paramount. A few hundred dollars mailed to every American family creates the illusion that government is lending a helping hand, but this money is not redistributing anything. It’s being taken from the same people who are receiving it, in the hope that they’ll just pump it back into the system at Wal-Mart or the Exxon station.

Whether the coming economic crisis will be deep or shallow is left to be seen. We may be at the start of the kind of depression our grandparents lived through in the ’30s, or we may simply experience what our parents lived through back in the ’70s. Foreign investment trusts may come in and buy our biggest banks and turn us into global citizens through the very World Bank policies we were hoping would turn all of them into US vassals.

Whatever the case, the best thing you can do to protect yourself and your interests is to make friends. The more we are willing to do for each other on our own terms and for compensation that doesn’t necessarily involve the until-recently-almighty dollar, the less vulnerable we are to the movements of markets that, quite frankly, have nothing to do with us.

If you’re sourcing your garlic from your neighbor over the hill instead of the Big Ag conglomerate over the ocean, then shifts in the exchange rate won’t matter much. If you’re using a local currency to pay your mechanic to adjust your brakes, or your chiropractor to adjust your back, then a global liquidity crisis won’t affect your ability to pay for either. If you move to a place because you’re looking for smart people instead of a smart real estate investment, you’re less likely to be suckered by high costs of a “hot” city or neighborhood, and more likely to find the kinds of people willing to serve as a social network, if for no other reason than they’re less busy servicing their mortgages.

The more connected you are to the real world, and the more consciously you reject the lure of the speculative ladder, the less of a willing dupe you’ll be in the pyramid scheme that’s in the process of collapsing all around us at this moment.

Think small. Buy local. Make friends. Print money. Grow food. Teach children. Learn nutrition. And if you do have money to invest, put it into whatever lets you and your friends do those things.

Posted on 3 May '08 by Douglas, under corporatism, economics.

20 Comments to “Riding Out the Credit Collapse”

#1 Posted by Gregory Peckory (03.05.08 at 10:58 )

Thanks for the warning Douglas. I’ve have two young children and don’t want to be swept up in the storm. I’ve started collecting grain, rice and canned food. I will be talking to my neighbors so we can all be prepared. What do you mean by printing money? some sort of paper that friends can exchange.

#2 Posted by Douglas (03.05.08 at 13:49 )

I mean alternative currencies – complementary currency. Look up the LETS system, Four Corners Exchange, or any of my posts on currency to see what I’m talking about. It’s not an end-of-the-world thing, more of an alternative to dependence on Fed money.

#3 Posted by Glossolalia Black (03.05.08 at 16:41 )

I think that much like the Kansas town that turned green after its destruction in the storms of last year (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17643060), American people’s relationship with money, labor, and the true cost of things will be changed by *this* storm as well. Greensburg, KS will eventually have the ability to be self-sustaining; if they follow through with this “greening” and its full potential, they’ll be able to stay lit when the whole grid goes down, and that’s essentially what we’ll eventually, as a nation, will have to come to realize.

Barter, local commerce, and just being good to each other is how we’ve survived long before this monstrosity we call an economy. It’s something to which we can return. I don’t think we’ve fully forgotten what we’re capable of, or where we come from.

#4 Posted by Gregory Peckory (03.05.08 at 21:10 )

Oh yea, I’m not preparing for the Apocalypse. Having rice and other food around as stock will help me save money to pay my mortgage.

#5 Posted by Andrew Mayer (04.05.08 at 10:59 )

This is a great piece Douglas. There’s such an overwhelming force to buy into the framing of person as a tiny corporation that it can be hard to remember that we aren’t even really in the game.

But the powerful message that they provide comes down into risk vs. security. How do you minimize the former while increasing the latter? The financial institutions and prevailing wisdom, even now, are that that their system is the only one that can provide you with financial safety into the future. As the mortgage crisis continues to metastasize, it’s becoming clearer isn’t true, but, at least historically, it made sense to save your pennies, and invest them wisely. The difference now is that it seems like there are far more financial predators who are after your money and time.

If we’re going to transition to a local, person based economy, then the alternative needs to have some way to convince those involved that it will be there for them now and in the future.

#6 Posted by rebecca (04.05.08 at 18:13 )

i’ve been bartering with people for a while now. i’ve got talents and resources others want and they have the same for me. it’s a much more sane system than the one America’s got going. if i could totally drop off the grid, i would ;-)

#7 Posted by Steven Kruyswijk (05.05.08 at 05:41 )

Hi Douglas,

Thanks for this article, nice to have such a clear explanation of the problem: speculation as a virtual economy that’s unfortunately disconnected from actual value creation/consumption/participation.

I like the ‘make friends’ bit, and I’d like to try and take it a little further. Say that it is possible to boot up a friendly economic system amongst peers. Could it be that such a system, especially when implemented with smart, distributed net tools, could flower into something that even the speculating ‘fat cats’ would want to get invited to?

Find the others…

It seems to me that the main issue affecting centralized economic policy is the assumption that the greater populace is fundamentally unable to practice friendly, synergetic self-governance. But this is obviously a self-fulfilling prophecy stemming from the kind of dark interpretation of fundamental human nature as professed by Bernays et al.

Let’s give ourselves a real place to put our money…

#8 Posted by DragonScholar (05.05.08 at 16:47 )

I’d add another thing – friends aren’t just neighbors, they can be people you live with.

We moved a friend in with us (much better job market). She gets the abilty to move and have us pay her rent for a month or two. When she gets a job (fortunately she’s got high demand skills), we end up saving thousands of dollars a year, we can buy in bulk, etc. One person can make a difference completely.

#9 Posted by Lars (08.05.08 at 03:24 )

Thanks Douglas,

I’m glad that there are still people in the U.S. who don’t lose the perspective on “speculative economy vs. real economy”. The language of “mainstream” analytic pieces is often so cryptic that it’s easy to lose, not by bad intention, but because the authors lost it as well.

Economy (and money) was originally invented to trade things people actually “need”, speculation came into place when there were enough people with more money than they needed. Whether it’s good or bad I don’t know, but it lead to an economy that was decoupled from the real world, and made it easy to forget about this fact.

#10 Posted by deadhead (09.05.08 at 19:36 )

Quite a good piece of alternative thinking, almost as inspiring reading as the spirit of Pirsig’s Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance once was, and better still though it’s happening now and in the real world.

My best wishes for a successful migration into a new order and a good life besides mainstream.

#11 Posted by Steven Kruyswijk (11.05.08 at 19:33 )

Really Doug… I think we’re living in times in which there is a wonderful new output to philosophy, in terms of gameful, ludic, distributed life game engineering.

This is what it’s all about, right? The deep programmability of our current culture is what you stressed in your books, and I see your point man!!! There is ample opportunity to build mobile/desktop HUDs that could catalyse homeostatic, synergetic behaviour amongst a whole-brained populace. I see this as possible, and as an awesome invitation to start grooving.

What if a friendly means of interchange could be developed from the small up; meaning a peer-to-peer implementation of LETS-style interchange running on Bluetooth. As a first cool gimmick, it could be a playful way of keeping bar tab scores amongst friends :-) In the best case, it would provide a means of optimal distribution of issuing power, thereby building a bigger-than-now scenario to which the current centralized systems can willingly be invited to as co-creators. It’s the enlightened way of Hacking Marketing Budgets, and we’re all gonna love it, I tell you! :-)

We can hack our logical deductions from the big Freudian Marketing experience into a new man model that does not necessarily start from a dualistic, paranoid stance. The rational and ‘irrational’ (or right-brained/metaphoric) can indeed work together when an elegant social model for unified consciousness is put forward. It seems to have to do with inviting egoic consciousness into an inherently bigger game of loving, intentful compassion.

What I propose is to honour great guys like Huizinga, McKenna and Erasmus, and to build a distributed life game, implementing the wonderful network effects of the Internet, working towards a feeling of national and then transnational trust in the possibility of a balanced, compassionate economic ecosystem. Honouring all the wonders of whole-brained realisation.

It’s gonna groove, it’s gonna work, I tell you. Here’s my substantiating evidence: http://youtube.com/watch?v=1csh0li2ckI

With much Love!

Steven Kruyswijk

#12 Posted by Propaganda Anonymous (12.05.08 at 15:38 )

Whoa! This is a great article. Doug, you broke down the sub-prime crisis in such erudite terms, as well as providing the proper back log material, some hope for the future.

Personally, I am not really sure how prepared I am for a possible depression. I have large amounts of out-standing debt, at the same time pursuing a ‘career’ (hate that word)
in fields the tenuous fields of music and writing. So, I’ve been used to riding by the seat of my pants for most of my life, the possible economic collapse plus global climate change and peak oil has got my mind reeling a bit.

Anyway, thanks again for this piece Doug.
I’m going to spread this to all who will listen

PEACE
Prop

#13 Posted by Alex Norden (29.05.08 at 15:04 )

Wonderful, concise and practical analysis of what has to be done, Douglas!

The making friends is paramount.

The trend of rolling back to a smaller homesteading community is manifesting itself on many planes. On one end, you have hardcore survivalists that are refusing to pay taxes and are moving to remote rural areas, creating a farm that will sustain them and a network of like-minded individuals.
On the other, city dwellers are starting to buy local produce, investing in green energy, buying used clothing.
This seems to be a part of a global trend of people awakening to their individual responsibility- for their destiny and freedom.

I will have to get back to you with the name, but a Russian anthropologist did very interesting research into how people there managed to survive the terrible economic crisis not so long ago.

He sad that due to the constant flux of government and economy in Russia, people had evolved a social mechanism of interaction based on barter and friendship, and may had small rural plots where they grew their own vegetables.

Most Russians would regularly have a stockpile sack of flour, potatoes, onions.
Enough to survive a winter.
Thus, you could live with no money for 6 months.

This would have sounded backwards and paranoid before the crisis, eh?

Now it looks like we have to accept that our liberty depends on independence from overseers, speculators and well-meaning big brothers.
Life is our responcibility alone.
What a shocker!

#14 Posted by adieb (07.06.08 at 15:57 )

Thank you for this amazing article. I have expressed it’s greatness to friends and encouraged them to find Arthur and read up.

I live in Nevada City, California, where all things community-oriented thrive greatly. The collaboration of locals here is amazing, and it is the ticket to our future freedom as the people buy local produce, use a local business barter-dollar, and enjoy some of the best, free K-12 educations in the nation. Everything you said makes perfect sense. I know that when the “virtual” economy hits the “real” workers in the gut, a community like ours will be ready. I am so very grateful for having been destined to live in such a place. I just hope I can be of some influence to the dear ones I know who live lives more centered around the monetary treasure and not the treasure that is wisdom and knowledge and friendship. I am in love with living in the mountains, and I can’t imagine where one would begin as to reforming big cities to ACTUALLY be the kinds of communities you speak of, but I have hope that such places can and must develop into existence.

#15 Posted by adieb (07.06.08 at 16:00 )

PS! Doug, thank you! You are an advocate of goodness and wisdom and in my last little ditty I didn’t express that! This article says more than enough. Thank you for being such a force in the heart of this crazy nation.

#16 Posted by Setsuna777 (15.06.08 at 02:38 )

Thank you so much for this concise, detailed, descriptive article that connected many erratic mental dots.

My fiancé and I both come from modest means and have pushed our way up out of restaurants and call centers to become professionals on hard work and luck alone, without the college educations we couldn’t afford. Now, we are both making decent salaries on the upper side of the middle class scale, still under 6 figures apiece. Needless to say, it seems as though we’ve come upon a fortune and find our modest success to be a blessed relief… and a bewilderment.

So please, would you be so kind as to share more of your insight? How can we go on to own a home, save for retirement and make investments 1 – safely, and 2 – without contributing to the problem?

Yes, we’ll have to save money from each paycheck, raise our credit scores and live within our means, as we already do. But after we have saved up that “6 month cushion” what can we possibly invest our savings in? Are there any stable American investments that won’t enslave our neighbors and still be of value by the time we’re 80? It’s hard enough feeling that our new-found prosperity comes from working for the devil during the day–I make up for the karmic deficit by doing pro-bono work for non-profits on the weekends. I don’t know how I could sleep at night if I were also a sociopathic pig stockholder or venture capitalist, nor do I want to take it up the ass in a money market when all those losses tumble downhill.

Also, a million thanks for “The Persuaders”. I’ll always refer to those stolen pages from Frank Luntz’s and Clotaire Rapaille’s playbooks when tackling their masters.

Thank you again!

#17 Posted by *Transcendental *Logic (25.06.08 at 09:03 )

[...] almost all I hear about. But wow, is it a tangled mess, and so far in all my reading and talking, no-one’s made better, clearer sense of it than Douglas Rushkoff does in this article. This is easy language, wonderfully written, and dead-on accurate; plus, it doesn’t stop and [...]

[...] makes sense to me (you know, in my heart)? I found a couple of potential key words today, via a Douglas Rushkoff article about excess wealth gap in the US causing credit bubbles and how local economies could protect us. [...]

#19 Posted by Kauaibrad (02.10.08 at 22:17 )

Awesome!

#20 Posted by Kit Krash (15.11.08 at 16:02 )

I just threaded through this after seeing you speak at the Korzybski memorial. In the early 90’s we had an art collective in New York City called Gargoyle Mechanique. We cooked and ate together, shared and made clothing and enjoyed possibly the best times of our lives on very little money.

We had a food jar, where we all pitched in a dollar a day. Each day it was someones turn to go shopping for food stuff and make dinner and their was a healthy competition on making really good and satisfying meals so we always ate well.

That this was a life that you could have once upon a time in New York City, still bewilders me. I try my best to relive it with my friends today, but everyone needs to make money and doesn’t have enough time. Maybe now is the time to get off the grid.