Police Brutality as Media Reframe

My friend Legba Carrefour has been working with DC Students for a Democratic Society and Students for a Democratic Society for some time, now (he’s 27), and has served as a great window for me into the world of public demonstrations and their regular suppression. A conversation got started on my email list, Media-Squatters, about the protests at the DNC last week, and a number of us were surprised by reports of police brutality – as well as how little any of this was broadcast on the major networks. (Here’s a link to the most famous of the brutality episodes in the Rocky Mountain News.

Here’s some of Legba’s report to us:

I have to first mention that I’m wasn’t at the DNC protests nor am I going to the RNC protests. I’m staying in DC doing media support and jail support from afar. I went to NYC for the 2004 RNC protests and I was, in the following order, beaten with a nightclub, wrapped in a giant orange net by the cops, set on fire (swear I’m not making that up), beaten again, arrested, put in a cage, hit by a cop car. So I’m taking it easy this time around.

The protests at the DNC are being organized under a couple of different umbrella groups. Broadly, it includes everything from progressives to anti-authoritarian radicals, with a lot of students
and youth under 30 and vets.

The conditions were pretty poor. The police had also erected a mini-Gitmo of free-speech zones–protest pens–into which to corral the bulk of demonstrators and any kind of activity was almost
immediately curbed. The other major problem was that there was effectively zero press coverage, even among liberal bloggers. I spent my week seeing liberal blogs excitedly gush about what was going on inside the convention and rail about Republican radicalism of the last eight years while I was cradling a phone in my hand listening to friends tell me stories of being beaten up a couple of blocks away.

That lack of coverage in a lot of respects really emboldens the police and allows them to get away with just about anything, aside from it absolutely impoverishing our ability to engage in a reasoned analysis of how power works and whether the Democrat vs. Republican frame actually depicts anything even close to reality.

And, speaking of police brutality, it’s pretty notable that they’ve been consistently targeting press. There was a documented incident where an ABC news producer was knocked down and arrested trying to get footage of delegates and donors. The police also detained and seized the equipment of the Glass Bead Collective (a well-known indymedia group). There was also the knocking down and detainment of a Code Pink member–probably the worst bit was seeing her get shoved down, the footage then cutting to her being interviewed by journalists, and then the cop walking up and grabbing her in the middle of the interview and dragging her off.

But that kind of one-time sensational pushing doesn’t really capture the full scale of what was going on. Marches were immediately surrounded by walls of police, people were told to leave, and then
they weren’t given any exit to leave and those who tried were arrested. There was a 100+ person mass arrest after the police simply decided that a large group of people milling about looked “suspicious” and were carrying rocks (which were never found, naturally), a convergence space was raided, and vehicles were simply stopped and searched and equipment was seized.

My connection to this is that I’m part of DC Students for a Democratic Society, which is part of the national Students for a Democratic Society organization. We’ve become known for an event called Funk theWar, which is a Reclaim the Streets style event–we like to call it a Militant Mobile Disco, and we’ve been called “suburban terrorists” by a couple of right-wing writers, which is offensive as we all live in DC. A good chunk of people in my chapter and a lot of people in SDS went to the DNC and are also going to the RNC protests.

I have to note though that this hasn’t stopped with the end of the DNC. In the Twin Cities, where the RNC is taking place, there was a massive raid on a convergence space with all inside (several hundred) detained in handcuffs (including a four-year-old) for hours simultaneous to a raid of three private homes around the area and then a raid on the base of I-Witness Video, a documentary outfit that specializes in recording incidents of police brutality and proved instrumental in getting people’s charges dropped after the 2004 RNC. The police called the whole thing a “criminal enterprise” and a
handful of individuals have been charged with “conspiracy to riot”, but no evidence has actually been found as far as anyone can tell.

I’m gonna cut this short because I’m going on a bit, but I think one really important thing comes out of this and this is really what I feel like you’d be interested in: What the police are doing here isn’t
stopping the demonstrations. They’re getting us to change the frame of discussion. Since these raids started, we’ve all switched from talking about the war, about capitalism, about the system, and about what we want in place of all this. We’re now talking about police brutality and we’re all getting a certain amount of titillation out of that. But it effectively completely sidelines why my friends are out there on the streets and why they’re willing to risk being beaten and arrested. Police action against doesn’t just shut down our march or cast a chill over organization activity–it helps us forget why we’re fighting and that scares me more than anything else. I saw the same thing happen to the anti-globalization movement after 9/11 hit and I hope we’re strong enough this time around to inoculate ourselves against this sort of attack.

Were you aware that all this had been going on during the DNC?

Posted on 2 September '08 by Douglas, under censorship.

7 Comments to “Police Brutality as Media Reframe”

#1 Posted by Gregory Peckory (02.09.08 at 20:18 )

The only report of a journalist being detained at the DNC was the one who took pictures of delegates at a private party and was arrested.
Its the so-called anarchist’s dumping over trash cans and breaking windows that give the storm troopers the advantage. The press could expose agent provocateurs. That could be a reason for the crack down on the press.
I know a lot of cops and they are have a good ole time at these events. Its like Disney Land for fascist pigs.

#2 Posted by Janet (03.09.08 at 17:57 )

Actually, yes. That’s because I’ve been getting my news from Salon, The Uptake, the Minnesota Independent, and Alex Jones. The St. Paul based Uptake sent citizen journalists to the DNC and has been reporting on the RNC and the police actions. The Minnesota Independent also has news of the Ron Paul Rally for the Republic, the alternative Republican convention.
Strange bedfellows indeed.
http://salon.com
http://theuptake.org/
http://www.minnesotaindependent.com/
http://www.infowars.com/

#3 Posted by Dave (04.09.08 at 01:04 )

Live video streaming from 3G mobiles and/or wifi-enabled mobiles/cameras would make it harder for the police to confiscate recorded material.
If done by enough people there should be enough evidence for the courts.

#4 Posted by M. Nestor (04.09.08 at 09:22 )

I agree that it’s a reframing thing, but I also can’t help but wonder if it serves any other purpose at all. I’ve never heard about protests in the news except as a conversation about police brutality or anarchist radicalism, with the only role technology playing being in arranging the protests or recording the horrifying footage or hurting people. I never thought of this as striking up a useful discourse or effecting positive change, so much as feeding back into the same old paradigms of power.

#5 Posted by nathan (05.09.08 at 16:19 )

Doug, are you really surprised by this, or is that a rhetorical flourish? This is classic crowd control. I was in NYC in during RNC2004 and it was ridiculous, the NYPD went so far as to force restaurant patrons off sidewalks etc.

Yes, it is absolutely enraging. I can’t afford to mount a worthwhile legal defense so I avoid these things, not that they matter anymore.

#6 Posted by Douglas (05.09.08 at 18:37 )

My surprise had more to do with the lack of TV coverage for any of it. I thought I remembered Boston being on CNN during the convention.

#7 Posted by mason (18.09.08 at 12:35 )

Coverage of the more distant WTO protests was marked by the old commentary of “Look at these well off degenerate youth making a spectacle of themselves!” and if partly honest, “Don’t they know the economic policies of these organizations, the G8 and this country have enabled them to be well off?”

The difference is the parents of the protesters of 68 worldwide immediately or eventually opened their eyes, sometimes only narrowly, but enough. Now we don’t even get a chance to see or hear the substance of real protest.

We have plenty of Control when it comes to coverage but no Giving, no Sympathising.

http://www.time.com/time/time100/artists/profile/eliot2.html

“The Waste Land was a deeply unoptimistic, un-Christian and therefore un-American poem, prefaced by the suicidal words of the Cumaean Sibyl, “I want to die.” It is, we could say, the first Euro-poem. In its desolation at the breakup of the Judeo-Christian past, the poem turns for salvation to the Buddha and his three ethical commandments: Give, Sympathize, Control. But on the way to its ritually religious close (“Shantih, shantih, shantih”), it films a succession of loveless or violent or failed sexual unions — among the educated (“My nerves are bad tonight”) and the uneducated (“He, the young man carbuncular, arrives”), and in the poet’s own life (“your heart would have responded / Gaily”). It speaks of an absent God and of a dead father.”

Long live the dead, forbidding, fascist and remote father and the media that constantly try to resurrect him.

“That corpse you planted in your garden. Has it begun to sprout? Will it bloom this year?” McCain ’08

-mason