President Obama

Though I share in the jubilation at Obama’s election, I find I’m also a bit guarded. Holding back, as if afraid to get “fooled again” by the promise of new leadership.

To be sure, it’s going to feel good and be good for America to have a potential world leader as our president – someone who, instead of bringing himself down to the level of the least common denominator, actually demands that we raise ourselves to his level of discourse and sophistication. Friends are asking me what words like “bipartisanship” mean – a sure sign that they are actually, finally interested in how government functions and what it is Obama might do to change it.

But I’ve also got the nagging sense that too many of us are still hoping and waiting for what Obama’s going to do. As if the president somehow enacts policies or spends money in a way that makes everything better. This is not what a president does. Yes, there are certainly public works programs Obama can promote, to rebuild highways or develop alternative energy technologies while giving jobs to more Americans. These are potentially great top-down stimuli for a failed economy and neglected infrastructure – but they do not rebuild a society ravaged by runaway deregulated capitalism and military misadventure.

That part is up to us. And in this sense, we must take Obama at his word: the moment is now, we are the ones we’ve been waiting for. The election of Obama is itself a cue. It’s a cue that America can elect a smart, capable, and caring person as its leader. That we are capable of transcending the logic of short-term self-interest, fear, and even racism. And if we are capable of doing this, it means we are better than we act most of the time. This moment is the bang of the starter’s pistol – an awakening, an opportunity.

When there’s a big blackout in New York, especially during the summer, some people take it as a “cue” to start looting. It’s not that the blackout itself makes it significantly to break down store fronts; it’s not that the police are so very busy with the blackout. The lights going out is a cue to behave differently – to release the hidden potential for vandalism and long-repressed rage.

Likewise, the election of a black man to the presidency is a cue that something has changed. As my friend, Ari Wallach explained to me on my new radio show last night, it’s a kind of “shock and awe.” There’s a thoughtful, progressive and black president-elect on the cover of the New York Post. The cognitive dissonance this generates is an opportunity to reprogram. It’s what advertisers and social programmers try to do in pretty much every communication they make. It’s as big a disconnect and reconnect as 9-11 was, only constructive instead of destructive. A narrative is broken; another is born.

But this new narrative is not the story of how we are led by some new person. It’s the story of how we lead ourselves. It’s about how we accept the cue to act.

Everyone I know in my own circles is obsessed with creating the next big Internet phenomenon or organization to marshall all this energy and help people do their own bottom-up activities. I’ve been invited to a few dozen meetings already for such projects, and I’m happy to see everyone so enthused. But if everyone wants to do the “meta” job of creating a brand or utility through which activism happens, then there will be no one left to do the actual organizing.

No, the opportunity is not to create the next great website for modeling bottom-up community activity, but to go and actually do the stuff. It is to participate the public school, work towards alternative energy possibilities, design and install bicycle lanes, argue at work for equal pay for women, assist local agriculture projects, develop complementary currencies and non-profit credit unions.

My faith in the change we need will be strengthened by my own and others initiative. Obama can inspire us, and even remove some of the obsolete regulations preventing progressive activities from taking hold. His ability to lead us out of this mire into a brighter future will be limited, however, by our own capacity to engage.

Obama’s going to be busy for while, anyway. Two wars, a dozen failed federal agencies, and a banking industry that needs to be dismantled are going to take up a lot of his time and energy. While he attends to mitigating the damage of past failures, it is we who need to build a new society based on the values we share but have closeted during these decades of institutionalized self interest.

How? Where? Just go out the door and look around. There’s opportunities literally everywhere. If we do get fooled again, it will only be because we have fooled ourselves.

Posted on 6 November '08 by Douglas, under politics.

22 Comments to “President Obama”

#1 Posted by Eddie (06.11.08 at 10:58 )

“…and a banking industry that needs to be dismantled…”
Somehow I don’t think they are going to just sit there and say “Oh, well Obama is going to dismantle us now, so much for that plan…”.

I’ve watched a ton of documentaries in the last few years, and from what I can gather, the ‘power elite’, or whatever you want to call them, would destroy the whole system before they handed it to us on a platter.

Honestly, I think you are the only person who I have seen come up with a real answer. “Find the Others”, that struck such a chord in me. The ‘power elite’ are hurting more than any of us deep inside, and the only way I can see them not destroying our global civilization, and forcing us to decend into some kind of tribalism again as a form of rebirthing, is to find the humanity inside the ‘power elite’ and let them know that if they relinquish their power we will still love them. Reassure them that *they* will still have a place in the world.

That is the real revolution where the individual will finally fall away, don’t worry about *your* place, or *your* self, care about everyone’s place, the groups self. There is an old saying about saving money… “take care of the pennies, and the pounds will take care of them selves”. I think that’s inverted, “Take care of the group, and the individuals will be taken care of by default”.

#2 Posted by Laura (06.11.08 at 12:02 )

Thank you for articulating these thoughts. Your post has helped me to mentally organize a lot of my own thoughts that have been swirling since Tuesday. Now, I have somewhat of an idea for a launching point. I appreciate the time you took to compose this reflection.

#3 Posted by willwindow (06.11.08 at 12:18 )

Your blog captured many of my sentiments concerning Obama’s election. I particularly resonated with the statement, “But this new narrative is not the story of how we are led by some new person. It’s the story of how we lead ourselves. It’s about how we accept the cue to act.”

I think of what has happened over the last eight years and how many of us just sat back and let it happen, and I wonder if we will accept the cue to act. One of Obama’s great strengths is his ability to inspire people–to get our hopes up. I just hope that we get inspired to do something ourselves. For more thoughts on this topic see http://happymortal.com/2008/11/human-nature-socialism-and-the-neocons/.

#4 Posted by AndrewMayer (06.11.08 at 12:58 )

I feel the trepidation as well. Maybe it comes from having been here before, but I feel as if I’m holding my breath, and waiting to see if the results match the promise.

But having had the power of my country turned against my ideals for so long, maybe it will be as simple as finally realizing that the gate has been opened.

#5 Posted by Len A. (06.11.08 at 14:40 )

Thanks for posting this, Doug. Def share your concern about complacency, folks waiting for the new Prez to fix everything. It’s heartening that Obama himself seems keenly aware of this, and addressed it in his acceptance speech.

After 8 years of immense destructive behavior by our leaders, its easy to feel that the power of those in charge is limitless, for good or ill. Bush & Co. were so “successful” in wrecking the country – can’t Obama & Co. be as successful in putting it back together?

But unfortunately, it’s easier to destroy than create; easier to move backwards than progress. I think and hope folks recognize this. With luck once the election glow wears off, we’ll start to see many people newly-empowered by this win, and eager to create REAL change in their own lives and communities. The incredible relief and hope many of us now feel can be channeled into actions to preserve it, and really take advantage of the possibilities of this moment.

#6 Posted by Steven Kruyswijk (06.11.08 at 17:47 )

I agree with Eddie, Find The Others! Find the legacy power elite and let’s play. Infer their original creative intentions.

I also agree wholeheartedly with Doug that we shouldn’t be too dependent on top-down leadership, also not from Obama.

The two combine in my view to a logical conclusion: embracing both top-down and bottom-up in a new supersystem of distributed, playful social engineering. For everyone, by everyone. Life Hacking meets Social Networking.

Pumping money around, creating meaningful, richly augmented transactions, with creative conviviality as a new supereconomics of which material wealth is a functional subset.

By the way Doug, I’ve never had a better reason to turn your attention to a post by David Wilcock, a 2012/consciousness researcher who seems to have done his homework. He has a wonderful new post out that mentions both Obama, popular music history and boxes we should get out of: http://twurl.nl/n53vj3

#7 Posted by Sara A. (06.11.08 at 18:24 )

I was disappointed with the elections this year as a whole, even though I voted for Obama. Although Obama was the more liberal of the two candidates, in overall terms he is very middle of the road. I think it says a lot about how conservative things have gotten that, by comparison, Obama’s lukewarm sentiments for change seem radical.

The two party system is like a restaurant where you can only order Coke or Pepsi. You can’t get water, or beer, or Sprite or Dr. Pepper or wine or a milkshake or any of the other wonderful beverages available out there. You can only have soda. And, that soda can only be Coke or Pepsi. People argue back and forth about the relative merits of each brand, but no one seems to realize that their only options are different flavors of hyped up nutrition-less sugar water.

As a side note, I halfway expect Obama to get assassinated before his presidency is over. Possibly before it even starts. What do you think for his chance of survival?

#8 Posted by Len A. (07.11.08 at 10:18 )

Spreading comments like the previous one, about our leaders getting killed, is in my view extremely reckless. I get that people are concerned: but asking a question like “What do you think for his chance of survival?” directly increases the likelihood that something awful will happen.

It’s important to think of the effect your words might have, before you spew them out your keyboard. Lloyd deMause has a great piece about this:

http://www.psychohistory.com/htm/eln01_leader.html

See also Al Giordano, around the time of Clinton’s RFK comment back in May:

“Messages sent like the one sent today – whether from the mouth of the original person whose fantasy flew out of her mouth – or from those decrying it, are precisely the kinds of signals that set off potential assassins.

If you think of many of the assassination attempts in the United States and the unstable mental states of the perpetrators (John Hinckley, Jr., Squeaky Fromme…) it is of the utmost irresponsibility to aid in the telegraphing of those suggestive messages to a public filled with people like that.”

#9 Posted by Allan (07.11.08 at 11:35 )

One of my biggest problems with Obama is that his followers seemingly hold him in way too high esteem. They see him as this fix-all messianic figure who will change the very course of history. I feel this simply is not the case. Yes, the man ran a very good campaign and particularly impressed me with his ability to open up discourse about the very real and persistent issue of racism that people don’t seem to want to tackle. However, this is not the coming of a new age, in my mind. (No, republicans, he’s not the anti-christ either). And while I feel Obama will open up many doors by way of energy and social reform, particularly in gay rights, I don’t favor his healthcare plan, of which I think will cause more harm than good. And his economic plan as a whole I’ve not been real enthusiastic about. I just hope people realize that until he actually proves that he can bring about the kind of social and cultural change that MANY of us crave for this country, I don’t see him as anything more than just another politician, albeit a promising one.

#10 Posted by Sara A. (07.11.08 at 15:34 )

@ Len A.

Hm. So we aren’t supposed to talk about something happening, even if we don’t support it, because that might make it happen?

Well, I will agree with you that my phrasing was too flippant and I apologize for it. But I don’t think that discussion should be stifled. Adults take educated risks. Refusing to discuss a topic because it might create risks is counterproductive, like burying your head in the sand.

Ah, Mr. Rushkoff, please delete both of my posts. I did not mean to start a flame thread on your blog.

#11 Posted by heif (07.11.08 at 15:41 )

guess what??!! we’ve created the next big Internet phenomenon/organization to marshall all this energy and help people do their own bottom-up activities! http://www.meetup.com !

#12 Posted by DJ (07.11.08 at 16:59 )

Wonderful post Douglas… Started a response here, but it got overly long, (as you hit upon exactly my own thoughts these past few days, as you always seem to do!), so I turned it into a response post… sorry for the link whoring, but wanted to share it… Have had so little time to post and write beyond what I’m already doing…
http://snafuprinciple.blogspot.com/2008/11/where-we-go-from-here.html

#13 Posted by mason (07.11.08 at 21:44 )

Hi Doug!

Welcome again here. I’m watching that Tom Hanks on an island film. It’s just like our situation now.

Of course, the real point is not coming home or exchanging or overlaying one graffitied logo over another. It’s about making mistakes, learning and faring forward.

“”Fare forward, travellers! not escaping from the past
Into different lives, or into any future;
You are not the same people who left that station
Or who will arrive at any terminus,
While the narrowing rails slide together behind you;
And on the deck of the drumming liner
Watching the furrow that widens behind you,
You shall not think ‘the past is finished’
Or ‘the future is before us’.
At nightfall, in the rigging and the aerial,
Is a voice descanting (though not to the ear,
The murmuring shell of time, and not in any language)
‘Fare forward, you who think that you are voyaging;
You are not those who saw the harbour
Receding, or those who will disembark.
Here between the hither and the farther shore
While time is withdrawn, consider the future
And the past with an equal mind.
At the moment which is not of action or inaction
You can receive this: “on whatever sphere of being
The mind of a man may be intent
At the time of death”—that is the one action
(And the time of death is every moment)
Which shall fructify in the lives of others:
And do not think of the fruit of action.
Fare forward.
O voyagers, O seamen,
You who came to port, and you whose bodies
Will suffer the trial and judgement of the sea,
Or whatever event, this is your real destination.’
So Krishna, as when he admonished Arjuna
On the field of battle.
Not fare well,
But fare forward, voyagers.

#14 Posted by Caleb (08.11.08 at 12:51 )

I’m not nearly as optimistic as you, in light of Obama’s first cabinet appointment:

http://www.alternet.org/election08/106189/is_obama_screwing_his_base_with_rahm_emanuel_selection/

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6201900&page=1

#15 Posted by Art (08.11.08 at 12:56 )

I, too, am guarded, and wonder if I’m not being a party pooper when I admit to being that way. But the choice of Biden as Vice Presidential choice dampened the change message for me, though I adjusted to it. But now I’m hearing nothing but talk about Washington old-timers filling the cabinet, aside from this Rahm guy from Chicago who’s missing a finger and has been known to send dead fish to people he didn’t like. Yes, I’m guarded, and perhaps I shouldn’t apologize for being that way.

#16 Posted by dvdsweeney (09.11.08 at 13:00 )

From this morning’s msnbc front page:
Obama positioned to reverse Bush actions.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27628719/

“A team of four dozen advisers, working for months in virtual solitude, set out to identify regulatory and policy changes Obama could implement soon after his inauguration. The team is now consulting with liberal advocacy groups, Capitol Hill staffers and potential agency chiefs to prioritize those they regard as the most onerous or ideologically offensive, said a top transition official who was not permitted to speak on the record about the inner workings of the transition.”

“The kind of regulations they are looking at” are those imposed by Bush for “overtly political” reasons, in pursuit of what Democrats say was a partisan Republican agenda, said Dan Mendelson, a former associate administrator for health in the Clinton administration’s Office of Management and Budget.

:::…

Seems like a good start.
- David.

#17 Posted by Steven Kruyswijk (10.11.08 at 12:53 )

Very cool cartoon by sinfest on the wonders of Obama:
http://tinyurl.com/emotopia

#18 Posted by pcleddy (11.11.08 at 12:38 )

Do you write the poem, and THEN fold it up?
——————–

Though I share in the jubilation
at Obama’s election,
I find I’m also
a bit guarded.

Holding back,
as if afraid
to get “fooled
again”

by the promise
of new leadership.

#19 Posted by edremitt (13.11.08 at 12:29 )

nice post

#20 Posted by Robert N. (14.11.08 at 13:59 )

Weird, I only just noticed when I saw that iconic Obama picture where he’s kind of looking upward, Douglas Rushkoff and Barack Obama resemble one another. Anyone else see it?

#21 Posted by joe (15.11.08 at 15:49 )

Um, I find the notion that we actually had a deregulated market kind of superficial or gullible. The problem seems more related to the rules and regulations for the most part. Maybe the idea that government would interfere seems odd to some, but they clearly create rules for companies and then give them money when the rules almost destroy them, such as the auto industry. This seems far more controlled and planned then I think people generally socially construct about this affair with the banks.

I almost wonder if they pretend to create laws and regulate in order to get bailouts in the first place, what better way to get advantage then by controlling both the political groups in WDC?

#22 Posted by robotson (22.12.09 at 06:15 )

still relevant today!

i recently found this podcast from back in ’07 where this guy interviews hakim bey and i think he largely echos your views on the internet thing, this “meta job” of making the channel for activism rather than doing anything in the real world.

he says toward the end of the thing that he basically doesn’t have any faith in the internet’s revolutionary potential, that it’s just turning everything into media.

a good listen if you’re into the guy:
http://www.rootsofrebellion.org/index.asp?pagemode=I&ID=127